Legal Opinion

Moon v. City of Port Arthur

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 28, 1988No. 09 87 166 CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DIES, Chief Justice.

Appellants, plaintiffs below, filed this action against the City of Port Arthur, the Pleasure Island Commission, and the Commission’s director for conversion of 130 crab traps and breach of a lease. Defendants moved for summary judgment, which was granted. Plaintiffs appeal, claiming under two points of error that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to both the alleged conversion and the alleged breach of lease.

In order to show himself entitled to a summary judgment, a movant has the burden of showing that there exists no genuine issue of material fact and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Coker v. CokerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  3. CKB & Associates v. Moore McCormack Petroleum, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Alsbury v. LinvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. P&T Manufacturing Co. v. Exchange Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Akin v. Santa Clara Land Co., Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API