Legal Opinion

Wicks v. Carlisle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 5, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from the District Court of Logan County; before John, , H. Burford, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of tbe court by

Burwell, J.:

M. L. Carlisle sued John C. Wicks in the district court of Logan county for two hundred dollars, alleged. to be due him from the defendant as commission for selling a business lot located in the city of Guthrie. Judgment was rendered for the plaintiff, and the defendant brings the case here on appeal. The evidence clearly establishes that Mr. Wicks authorized the plaintiff to sell the lot for $7,-•000, but he testified that before the lot was sold for that sum he told Carlisle that he would not sell for that price; all of which was denied by the plaintiff.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fossett v. Rock Island Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Birnbach v. KirspelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. Lucas v. AdomaitisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  4. Ryan v. Reed Air Filter Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1930
  5. Manker v. ToughSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API