Legal Opinion

Mahoney v. Leddy

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 4, 1966No. 354PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarney, J.

Miss Peck, a well-to-do spinster, and her long-time companion-housekeeper, Miss Egan, attempted to dispose of certain property interests between them during their lifetime. The consequence was the one thing they presumably sought to avoid, litigation between their estates. Thirty-six shares of American Telephone and Telegraph common stock, transferred in 1945 to the name of Miss Egan, have now become a substantial property interest through stock splits and market advances. The shares were in Miss Egan’s possession at her death in July, 1963, six months prior to the death of Miss Peck. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Conn. River Savings Bank v. AlbeeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1892
  2. Dieter v. ScottSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  3. O'brien, Admr. v. HoldenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1932
  4. Straw v. MowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  5. Methodist Church of Sandgate v. First Nat. BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stevens v. CROSS ABBOTT COMPANYSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  2. Golleher v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  3. Tromblay v. DacresSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  4. Monti v. Granite Savings Bank and Trust Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1975
  5. State ex rel. Insurance Commissioner of West Virginia v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of West Virginia, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API