Legal Opinion

Perrin v. Glassport Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeals, Nos. 53 and 54PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Sadler,

Donald Perrin was injured by the truck of the defendant. With his father, he brought suit for damages, averring negligence on the part of its driver, and from the adverse verdict directed, and the judgment entered thereon, these appeals are taken. The plaintiffs resided in Hemlock Alley, in the City of Pittsburgh, and the Glass-port Lumber Company had been requested to do some plastering work at their home. One Milligan was the employee sent to perform the service, and he drove the car carrying the materials required. The truck was left standing in the street…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Brennan v. Merchant & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  2. Silberstein v. Showell, Fryer & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Gillespie v. McGowanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
  4. Petrowski v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1919
  5. Hughes v. Murdoch Storage & Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hojecki v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Slother v. JaffeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Rapczynski Et Ux. v. W.T. Cowan, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Hartigan v. Public LedgerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  5. Schroeder v. Gulf Ref. Co., (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API