Legal Opinion

Story v. Hamaker

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1967PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenecke, J.

Plaintiffs brought this law action to recover $10,000 allegedly paid by the plaintiffs as the down payment pursuant to a land sale contract. The trial court sitting without a jury found for the defendant.

Plaintiffs and the defendant’s decedent, Hoyt, executed a land sale contract which recites that the plaintiffs agree to purchase, and Ployt to sell, Hoyt’s ranch for $40,000. The document states the purchase price is payable “$10,000 at the time of the execution of this agreement, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged.” According to plaintiffs’ testimony the $10,000 was paid by the…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bonded Credit Co. v. HendrixOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Pendleton Grain Growers v. PedroOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Roberts v. MazeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Hendricks Law Firm PC v. ForakerDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API