Legal Opinion

Ammerman v. Raymond Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 27, 2008No. 1-07-1666 RelPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

Raymond Corporation (Raymond), one of the named defendants in plaintiff Shala Ammerman’s products liability and negligence action, appeals from a trial court order denying its motion to transfer the case pursuant to the doctrine of forum non conveniens. On appeal, Raymond asserts that the trial court’s order constitutes an abuse of discretion because the private and public interest factors used in forum non conveniens analysis strongly support the conclusion that the case should be tried in Kane County, rather than Cook County, where Am-merman filed suit. We affirm.

On October 19, 2004,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Dawdy, Jr. v. Union Pacific R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Bland v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Glass v. DOT Transportation, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  2. Erwin Ex Rel. Erwin v. Motorola, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Bruce v. AtaderoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
  4. Shaw v. HaasAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019
  5. Evans v. PatelAppellate Court of Illinois · 2020

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API