Wilson v. State

Miller, Judge.

Following a jury trial, Wilbert Jerome Wilson was convicted of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and aggravated assault. On appeal he contends that the evidence at trial was insufficient to sustain his conviction for aggravated assault.1 We hold that the evidence was sufficient for the jury to conclude that Wilson was guilty of the charged offense beyond a reasonable doubt and therefore affirm.

Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence reveals Wilson was driving in a truck with his cousin, and that his cousin leaned out of the window and shouted a…