Dady v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Action to recover the value of extra work in connection with a municipal contract.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackmar, J.
On the 16th day of August, 1905, the plaintiff and defendant made a contract whereby the plaintiff agreed to erect a pumping plant and infiltration gallery at Massapequa, to he paid for according to an agreed schedule of prices for the items of work done. The estimated amount of the contract was $327,800. On the 14th day of November, 1905, the same parties made a supplemental contract for the installation of manholes and pumping stations at an estimated cost of $7,160. During the progress of the *384work the plaintiff, pursuant to oral orders of the chief engineer of the department of water, gas…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Moore v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Gearty v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Port Jervis Water Works Co. v. Village of Port JervisNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Abells v. City of SyracuseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
- Keane v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People ex rel. Dady v. PrendergastAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Zacharkow v. BerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933