Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided October 26, 2004No. 03-3176Published

1DissentFisher, Circuit Judge

I dissent because I disagree with the majority’s analysis of Count I. I join the majority’s affirmance of the remainder of the claims on appeal. But I would affirm the district court’s determination of the untimeliness of the Class’ claims in Count I asserting that the Air Line Pilots Association (“ALPA”) breached its duty of fair representation (“duty”) under the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151, et. seq.

A fundamental premise of the majority opinion is that Supplement CC (the November 8, 2001 agreement between American’s pilots and American regarding seniority integration of former TWA…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Carlos Henderson and Charlie Richardson v. Officer Dennis Bolanda, Star No. 32Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Robert T. Sisco v. Consolidated Rail Corp. And United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  5. In Re Trans World Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API