Legal Opinion

Mordkin v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 17, 1996No. Docket No. 14259-93Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD P. MORDKIN AND CINDY MORDKIN, Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Mordkin v. Commissioner

Docket No. 14259-93.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1996-187; 1996 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 201; 71 T.C.M. (CCH) 2796;

April 17, 1996, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Patrick E. McGinnis, for petitioners.

Janice D. Newell and Mary P. Kimmel, for respondent.

CHIECHI, Judge

CHIECHI

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

CHIECHI, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies in, additions to, and accuracy-related penalties on petitioners' Federal income tax:

Additions

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. United States v. BoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Commissioner v. South Texas Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. United States v. CartwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API