Legal Opinion

Pittman v. Mahoney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 26, 1981Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner Pittman appeals from an order of Special Term dismissing his petition to invalidate the designating petition of respondent Bassett. Petitioner challenged the validity of certain signatures on a variety of grounds. Special Term found 573 valid signatures, 500 being required for designation. We find that 59 of the 573 signatures are invalid because of uninitialed, unexplained alterations (Matter of Klemann v Acito, 64 AD2d 952, affd 45 NY2d 796; Matter of Nobles v Grant, 57 AD2d 600, affd 41 NY2d 1048). Two additional signatures…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Klemann v. AcitoNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Nobles v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  3. Sharpton v. PreviteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API