Legal Opinion

Baird v. First National Bank

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1910PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Dunklin Circuit Court. — Eon. J. L. Fort, Judge. (1) The court erred in admitting the testimony of Mrs. T. J. Baird on behalf of the plaintiff, respondent herein. R. S. 1899, sec. 4656; White v. Chaney, 20 Mo. App. 389; Wheeler v. Tinsley, 75 Mo. 459; Reno v. Kingsberry, 39 Mo. App. 240; Flannery v. Railroad, 44 Mo. App. 396; Bank v. Wright, 104 Mo. App. 243; Hardy v. Matthews, 42 Mo. 406.

1Opinion of the CourtGray, J.

The respondent brought this suit in the circuit court of Dunklin county, alleging that he deposited $289.80 with the appellant on or about the 15th day of May, 1906; that afterward the bank denied receiving the money, and that plaintiff had never withdrawn the same from the bank, and asked for a judgment for $289.80, the amount of his deposit. The plaintiff offered testimony to support the allegations of his petition, and the defendant offered testimony tending to prove that the deposit was never made. ' The cause was tried before a jury, resulting in a verdict in favor of plaintiff, for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Fishback v. HarrisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1909

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gottschall v. GeigerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
  2. Lyle v. AndalaftMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914
  3. The Senaca Co. v. EllisonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919
  4. Baird v. First National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API