Bihler v. Platt
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the District Court of the Nineteenth Judicial District, City and County of San Francisco. The plaintiff had judgment, and the defendants appealed. The other facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court :
The action was commenced before the Codes took effect, and its object is to quiet the plaintiff’s title to a parcel of land included in the “ Rancho de Herman,” which was granted by the Mexican Government to one Rufus, and the title to which has been finally confirmed and patented to Meyer, Bennitz, Hendy, Glein, and Duncan, as the successors in interest of Rufus. The petition for confirmation was filed in 1852, in the names of Meyer, Bennitz, Hendy, Glein, and Duncan, to whom the patent subsequently issued, and the plaintiff deraigns his title under Meyer and Bennitz, and the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schmitt v. GiovanariCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- McDonald v. McCoyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898