Legal Opinion

State v. Reed

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided April 22, 2004No. 03-1781-CRPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDykman, J.

¶ 1. Brent R. Reed appeals from a non-final order denying his motion to dismiss an obstructing an officer charge. This interlocutory appeal was to be heard by one judge pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 752.31(2)(f) (2001-02). The chief judge ordered that this appeal should be considered by a panel of three judges. See Wis. Stat. § 752.31(3). We granted leave to appeal to clarify the exculpatory denial exception to Wis. Stat. § 946.41 set forth in State v. Espinoza, 2002 WI App 51, 250 Wis. 2d 804, 641 N.W.2d 484, review denied, 2002 WI 48, 252 Wis. 2d 151, 644 N.W.2d 687 (Wis. Apr. 22, 2002) (No.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peters v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990
  3. State v. EspinozaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. Nicolet Minerals Co. v. Town of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ReedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. ReedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. ReedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API