Legal Opinion

Odome v. Goord

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 24, 2004PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, an inmate, submitted a urine specimen in connection with his planned participation in the family reunion program. After the specimen tested positive for the presence of cannabinoids, he was denied participation in the program and was charged in a misbehavior report with, among other things, unauthorized use of a controlled substance. Following a tier…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Claudio v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Myers v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. Tafari v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Tankleff v. SenkowskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. Hernandez v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Antinuche v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Figueroa v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Boatwright v. McGinnisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Mullen v. Superintendent of Southport Correctional FacilityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. Johnson v. SelskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API