People v. Wilbert
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We agree with the determination of the suppression court that the initial statement defendant made to the police was not the product of custodial interrogation. Whether a defendant is in custody is a question for the trier of fact (see, People v Waymer, 53 NY2d 1053, 1054; People v Grimes, 162 AD2d 1031, lv denied 76 NY2d 893) and is to be accorded great respect and left undisturbed unless it is erroneous as a matter of law or unsupported by the record (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759, 761; People v McIntyre, 138 AD2d 634, lv denied 72 NY2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. ChappleNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. OatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- People v. McIntyreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. WattsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. MercedAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. Bell-ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.