Legal Opinion · Dissent

Grace v. Royal Indemnity Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 24, 2007No. 3D02-1245Published

1DissentRamirez, J.

I respectfully dissent. Based on Aguilera v. Inservices, Inc., 905 So.2d 84 (Fla. 2005), I believe the complaint alleges sufficient facts to support a cause of action for an intentional infliction of emotional distress.

Otto Grace was an employee of Dynair Services when, on April 4, 1997, he was injured in a work-related accident. Dynair had a contractual relationship with Royal Indemnity Company to provide workers’ compensation benefits, disability benefits and medical benefits to workers injured on the job. Royal Indemnity had an insurance company and/or health maintenance organization…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aguilera v. Inservices, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. Knox v. Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  3. Ingraham v. Travelers Indem. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API