Legal Opinion
A. B. Magonigle Trucking Co. v. Tambini
New York Court of Appeals
Decided January 18, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed insofar as it dismisses the first and second causes of action in the amended complaint as to defendants Laurence F. Tambini and Tambini Storage Warehouse, Inc., and modified, insofar as it dismisses the second cause of action as against Jennie Tambini, by denying the motion to dismiss said cause of action insofar as it charges her with fraud, without costs. *620Inasmuch as plaintiff’s first cause of action is sufficient as against defendant Jennie Tambini under subdivision (d) of section 8 of the Commercial Rent Law (L. 1945, ch. 3, as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- David v. FaymanNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Rosner v. Textile Binding & Trimming Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
- Rosenbluth v. SackadorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Sno-Wite, Inc. v. Gerald Operating Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lyon Ford, Inc. v. Ford Marketing CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1971
- AB MAGONIGLE TRUCKING CO., INC. v. TambiniNew York Court of Appeals · 1951