Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Cleveland
Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DON H. REAVIS, Justice.
Appealing from a judgment based upon a jury verdict that appellee Mona Cleveland recover $816,493.69 on her underin-sured motorist claim, appellant Bituminous Casualty Corporation presents eight issues. Bituminous contends:(1) a “treating” physician who is provided information and paid by counsel for reviewing such information in advance of testifying at trial when called by counsel a is “retained” expert;(2) the trial court erred in admitting medical testimony of causation by the “treating” expert who changed his opinion after Cleveland’s counsel provided the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hong v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Gunn v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
- Michael Hospadales and Loomis Armored US, LLC v. Roy McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Irving Holdings, Inc. v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
- Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC v. Dawn Bishop, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.