Legal Opinion

Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Cleveland

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided May 24, 2006No. 07-05-0235-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DON H. REAVIS, Justice.

Appealing from a judgment based upon a jury verdict that appellee Mona Cleveland recover $816,493.69 on her underin-sured motorist claim, appellant Bituminous Casualty Corporation presents eight issues. Bituminous contends:(1) a “treating” physician who is provided information and paid by counsel for reviewing such information in advance of testifying at trial when called by counsel a is “retained” expert;(2) the trial court erred in admitting medical testimony of causation by the “treating” expert who changed his opinion after Cleveland’s counsel provided the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dow Chemical Co. v. FrancisTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Helena Chemical Co. v. WilkinsTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Cire v. CummingsTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Lee Lewis Construction, Inc. v. HarrisonTexas Supreme Court · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hong v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2006
  2. Gunn v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  3. Michael Hospadales and Loomis Armored US, LLC v. Roy McCoyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2017
  4. Irving Holdings, Inc. v. Brown, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2009
  5. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC v. Dawn Bishop, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2018

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API