Legal Opinion

State v. Diaz-Rivera

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 28, 2010No. 08C41113; A139086PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Defendant was convicted of delivery of methamphetamine, ORS 475.890, delivery of cocaine, ORS 475.880, delivery of heroin, ORS 475.850, and child neglect in the first degree, ORS 163.547. She contends on appeal that the sentence imposed by the trial court violated OAR 213-012-0020. Although she did not preserve the issue before the trial court, she argues we should consider it as plain error. The state concedes that the trial court plainly erred in imposing a sentence in violation of OAR 213-012-0020. We agree, accept that concession, exercise our discretion to review the error, and conclude…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. RodveltCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  2. State v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DIAZ-RIVERACourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API