Legal Opinion

Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Carstens

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1904PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This case was decided by the court En Banc. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Marion county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.

This cause was submitted here upon abstracts of the record which were not excepted to, and under the rule they are admitted to be correct. The abstracts show that on May 17, 1900, in the Circuit Court for Marion county, William A. Fulton, as receiver of the Franco-Amer-can Phosphate Company, filed a praecipe for a summons ad respondendum against Frederick Gesterding, and on the same day filed an affidavit in garnishment proceedings and suggested the names of the Florida Central- and Peninsular Railroad Company, a corporation, and E. D. Lukenbill as garnishees. The summons ad respondendum was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. McClureSupreme Court of Vermont · 1864
  2. Commercial National Bank v. Payne ex rel. Cunningham Sons Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lake Park State Bank v. Rood Bros.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  2. Camodeca v. CamodecaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API