Legal Opinion

People v. Santiago

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 12, 1999PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: County Court properly denied defendant’s request for a missing witness charge. The request, made after the close of the proof, was untimely (see, People v Bender, 244 AD2d 910, 910-911, lv denied 91 NY2d 923; People v Castro-Garcia, 203 AD2d 899, lv denied 83 NY2d 965). We reject the contention that defendant was denied effec*847tive assistance of counsel at trial. “[T]he evidence, the law, and the circumstances of [this] case, viewed in totality and as of the time of the representation, reveal that the attorney provided meaningful representation”…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. Castro-GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. BenderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. RichardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. People v. Garrido-ValdezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API