Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Daniel

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 31, 1984No. 83-721PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court granted certiorari in this case under Rule 39 (c), A.R.A.P., to determine whether or not the Court of Criminal Appeals was correct in its conclusion that petitioner was not denied competent counsel in his trial on a charge of capital homicide, § 13A-5-31 (5), Code 1975, which trial occurred in November 1981. We affirm.

As the opinion of the Court of Criminal Appeals discloses, this Court had in an earlier decision granted certiorari, remanding this case to the Court of Criminal Appeals with directions to remand the case to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing on the issue of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Engle v. IsaacSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  5. United States v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. McDonald v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. GerlaughArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Hubbard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1986
  4. Weeks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1989
  5. Crowe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API