Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Estate of Winebarger

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 28, 1971No. 33927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEIER, Commissioner.

Claim in quantum meruit based on personal services against decedent’s estate, seeking payment of $5,000.00. From a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s case, he appeals from the judgment of the circuit court. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff Raymond Griffith filed his claim against the estate of Herman Wine-barger, deceased, in the probate court, alleging that from September 1, 1966, to October 4, 1968, he rendered services to the deceased, being, in part, housework, including preparation of meals; acted as a companion, as a nurse when deceased was ill; accompanied…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jaycox v. BruneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Smith v. Estate of SypretSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Hubbard v. Estate of HappelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Laclede Gas Company v. Hampton Speedway CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Upshaw v. LathamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Schanz v. Estate of TerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. Strauser v. Estate of StrauserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API