Legal Opinion

In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 7, 2011No. SC10-2242PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

We have for consideration amendments to Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420" (Public Access to Judicial Branch Records). We have jurisdiction 1 and amend the rule as suggested by the Florida Courts Technology Commission’s Subcommittee on Access to Court Records (Access Subcommittee) to include presentence investigation reports and attached psychological and psychiatric evaluations as an additional category of records that the clerk must automatically maintain as confidential pursuant to rule 2.420(d)(1)(B) of the Rules of Judicial Administration. A party seeking to maintain as confidential…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
  2. In Re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420Supreme Court of Florida · 2010

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Implementation of Committee on Privacy & Court Records Recommendations—Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
  2. In Re AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION 2.420Supreme Court of Florida · 2014
  3. In re Amendments to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.420Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  4. Poole v. South Dade Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Criminal ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API