Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Praetorian Realty Corp. & Presidential Towers Residence, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1976PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order affirmed, with costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division, with the following added comments: Appellant Praetorian Realty seeks to avoid arbitration on the ground that the agreement provides that only certain of its clauses are to survive the delivery of title and, further, that the claims asserted by respondent Presidential Towers fall within those clauses which did not survive the delivery of title. This argument raises an issue addressed to the merits of those claims, and is therefore within the province of the arbitrator. The arbitration clause is concededly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nationwide General Insurance v. Investors Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Markowits v. FriedmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Dazco Heating & Air Conditioning Corp. v. C.B.C. Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Blatt v. SochetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Ferrarella v. GodtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  5. Brown v. BusseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API