Legal Opinion

Ohio National Bank v. Harris

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1933No. 23618PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

Did Elizabeth, at the testator’s death, take a fee-simple title to the one-fifth interest in the home property, as the Court of Appeals held, or did her son David take a fee title thereto by way of executory devise at his mother’s death?

The journal entries disclose that the common pleas court held that the true intention and construction of the second and third clauses of item six of the will require that they should be construed as if they read: “In case any of testator’s children shall die at any time leaving issue, the share of the devisee went to the issue; and if any of them should die…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rees v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Lightfoot v. BeardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  3. Liesman v. LiesmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Drager v. McIntoshIllinois Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Everhard v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1945
  2. Steinbrenner v. DreherOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  3. McCulloch v. YostOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Avery v. Avery, Admx.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Polen v. BakerOhio Supreme Court · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API