Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Klepper's Estate

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 10, 1953No. 48172Published

1DissentGabfield, J.

(dissenting) — I respectfully dissent from Division I of the majority opinion.

I think the question whether there was a family relationship was for the jury, not the court, and claimants’ motion to strike this defense was properly overruled. Claimants’ argument there is no evidence to support this defense is largely based on the fact decedent was sick and therefore unable to render reciprocal-services. We have never held such inability is fatal, as a matter of law, to the defense of family relationship. In fact we have held to the contrary. It is merely one of the elements to be considered by…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of TaltySupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  2. Marietta v. MariettaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  3. Snyder v. NixonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  4. Ambrose v. HackertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  5. Estate of Bishop v. PearsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API