Legal Opinion

Flintkote Co. v. National Asbestos Mfg. Co.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided November 23, 1929Published

1Opinion of the Court

RUNYON, District Judge.

The plaintiff herein is the owner of two patents, the first one, No. 908,125, granted December 29,1908, known as the Overbury patent, and the second, No. 1,410,018, granted March 21, 1922, and known as the Kiracofe patent, and the issues of validity and infringement of both patents are here involved, inasmuch as the machine used by defendant, it is claimed, infringes the Kiracofe patent, while the product thereof is alleged to infringe the Over-bury patent.

These patents relate to the roofing industry, and to that phase thereof which deals with the manufacture of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  2. Vanmanen v. LeonardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
  3. American Tube Works v. Bridgewater Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1904
  4. Yates v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1921
  5. Knight Soda Fountain Co. v. Walrus Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API