Legal Opinion

Azzollini v. Watkins

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 10, 1949No. 168, Docket 21217PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

Until the enactment of the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946, it was clear that habeas corpus was the only procedure by which deportation proceedings could be reviewed. Imperiale v. Perkins, 62 App. D.C. 279, 66 F.2d 805; Kabadian v. Doak, 62 App.D.C. 114, 65 F.2d 202; Sibray v. United States, 3 Cir., 185 F. 401. Petitioner contends that § 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 1009, authorizes review by means of this petition to review, even though he is not now in custody. The Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit so held in United States ex rel…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Trinler v. CarusiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  2. Kabadian v. DoakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
  3. Sibray v. United States ex rel. KupplesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1911
  4. Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  5. Impiriale v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Heikkila v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Birmingham v. Loetscher Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  3. Connor v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
  4. Prince v. Commissioner of Immigration & NaturalizationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1949
  5. Harisiades v. ShaughnessyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API