Legal Opinion

Globe Automatic Sprinkler Co. v. Boester

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit by plaintiff, Globe Automatic Sprinkler Company, for the balance due it under a contract for the installation of a sprinkler system in certain property known variously as North Hills Country Club and Norwood Country Club, together with a prayer that in the event such balance was not paid within a time to be fixed by the court, plaintiff's vendor's lien might be foreclosed, and the property sold, and the proceeds of the sale applied to the indebtedness due plaintiff.

It appears from the stipulated facts in the case that the property in question, which is located in St. Louis…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thomas v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1882
  2. Crane Co. v. Epworth Hotel Construction & Real Estate Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  3. Fred W. Wolf Co. v. Hermann Savings BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Kelvinator St. Louis, Inc. v. SchaderMissouri Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Curry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Seven Palms Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. Curry v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API