Friedmann v. State of Washington
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 9 10 MICHAEL FRIEDMANN, CASE NO. 3:25-cv-05272-DGE 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 12 v. 13 STATE OF WASHINGTON et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 On April 3, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge David W. Christel issued an order 17 granting Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), finding that he was unable 18 to afford the filing fee, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). (Dkt. No. 5.) Judge Christel found 19 that based on the allegations in the proposed complaint, it did not appear…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- In re Pegasus Gold Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Slocum v. MayberrySupreme Court of the United States · 1817
- Micomonaco v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.