Neal v. Halliburton

In a well written opinion, the lower Court has clearly set forth the issues in this case and after giving its reasons for disagreeing with the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Deano, Inc., v. Michel, 191 La. 233, 185 So. 9, decided by that Court October 31, 1938, felt bound to follow it. It therefore, against its better judgment, rendered judgment for defendant, rejecting plaintiff's demands. The opinion of the lower Court is as follows:

"Plaintiff, a duly licensed realtor, brings this suit to recover of Jack Halliburton $500.00 commission on the sale of his home. The testimony…