Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Northern Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 10, 1942No. 32,924PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stone, Justice.

There must be valuable consideration in order to make a bilateral, executory agreement an enforceable contract. If the agreement be for the modification of such a contract, there results ordinarily a new one consisting of the old so far as it remains unchanged and the new terms and conditions introduced by the modification. The contract-making process has been repeated, and its essentials must be present. It follows that the new agreement is not a contract if it lacks consideration. King v. D. M. & N. Ry. Co. 61 Minn. 482, 68 N. W. 1105; 2 Dunnell, Dig. & Supp. § 1776.

That…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. King v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Northern Timberline Equipment, Inc. v. GustafsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  2. Stanley Trucking Co. v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  3. Kluesner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API