Legal Opinion
Kemp v. Pfizer, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 4, 1996No. Civil Action 92-40591PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
GADOLA, District Judge.
Before the court is the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, filed on September 25, 1996. The defendants seek to dismiss, as a matter of law, plaintiffs claims for punitive and exemplary damages set forth in Counts XVI and XVII of the Amended Complaint, and plaintiffs claims for hedonic damages set forth in plaintiffs damage report. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(e)(2) (E.D.Mieh. January 1, 1992), this court will dispense with oral argument and decide this motion on the submissions of the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Bell v. City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Kewin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Frontier Insurance Company, Movant-Appellant v. Donald Blaty, Personal Representative of the Estate of Melva Dee Parrott, Deceased, Eagle Village, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Sandy Moore, Donald Blaty v. Eagle Village, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Sandy Moore, Frontier Insurance Company, Movant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Brereton v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
- Blair ex rel. Estate of Blair v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- KM Leasing, Inc. v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 1999
- Frontier Insurance v. BlatyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006