Smith v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
■Appeal from District Court, Le Flore County; Malcolm E. Rosser, Judge. Charley Smith was convicted of larceny of domestic animals, and brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
The plaintiff in error, Charley Smith, was convicted at the April, 1911, term of the district court of Le Flore county on a charge of larceny of domestic animals, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in - the. state penitentiary for a period of three years. The appeal was perfected in this court on the 21st day of October, 1911. The petition in error points out no specific ground for reversal, but generally alleges error in the overruling of the motiQn for new trial and in arrest of judgment. No briefs have been filed by counsel on behalf -of the plaintiff in error, and no appearance made…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
- Stevenson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917