Legal Opinion

B & R Luncheonette Inc. v. Fairmont Theatre Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff is the lessee of store premises and brings this action at law against the defendant owner of the adjoining property to recover damages for an alleged trespass and nuisance. The plaintiff conducts a luncheonette and ice cream parlor in the demised premises and intended to use the rear yard as a summer garden. The plaintiff, however, has been deprived of the use and enjoyment of this portion of the premises by reason of the defendant’s wrongful interference in causing a spray to fall on the yard area from a cooling tower on the roof of the defendant’s theatre. The trespass or…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pappenheim v. Metropolitan Elevated Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Uline v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Dietzel v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Mott v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Ewanski v. Solvay Process Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Stewart v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. Kennedy v. Hoog, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  4. MARTIN ET UX v. Reynolds Metals Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959
  5. McMullan v. HRH Construction, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API