Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. Hess

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1943No. 173Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Frankfurter

I agree with the decision of the Court. But it seems to me that the plea of double jeopardy should be rejected on a ground other than that taken by the Court. In all other respects I join in its opinion.

This is a qui tam action under R. S. § 3490 to recover a “forfeiture” and “double the amount of damages which the United States may have sustained” by reason of the same acts of fraud for which the respondents were previously indicted under § 37 of the Criminal Code, 18 U. S. C. 1 88, and for which substantial fines were imposed upon them. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no person shall…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. O'Sullivan v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1914

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API