United States Ex Rel. Marcus v. Hess
Supreme Court of the United States
1ConcurrenceJustice Frankfurter
I agree with the decision of the Court. But it seems to me that the plea of double jeopardy should be rejected on a ground other than that taken by the Court. In all other respects I join in its opinion.
This is a qui tam action under R. S. § 3490 to recover a “forfeiture” and “double the amount of damages which the United States may have sustained” by reason of the same acts of fraud for which the respondents were previously indicted under § 37 of the Criminal Code, 18 U. S. C. 1 88, and for which substantial fines were imposed upon them. The Fifth Amendment guarantees that no person shall…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Helvering v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. BalintSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- United States v. La FrancaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- O'Sullivan v. FelixSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.