Legal Opinion

Fundenberg v. Southern Pub. Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 15, 1917No. 22323Published

Action by E. A. Fundenberg against the Southern Publishing Company, Incorporated. Judgment in the First city court of the city of New Orleans for plaintiff, on defendant’s appeal to Court of Appeal, was affirmed, and from an order directing the clerk to deliver a copy of the mandate or decree to plaintiff to be filed in the_ First city court for execution, defendant petitions for writs of certiorari, prohibition, and mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, J.

The pleadings and facts in this ease are identically the same as in the case of Joseph E. Salittes v. Southern Publishing Co., Inc., In re Southern Publishing Co., Inc., applying for writs of certiorari, mandamus and prohibition (No. 22319, decided this day) 73 South. 847, ante, p. 739.

For the reasons assigned in that case, the rule issued herein is made absolute, and it is ordered that the peremptory writ of prohibition issue herein as prayed for, at the cost of the appellee.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Salittes v. Southern Pub. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917