Stubing v. Stubing
New York City Court
Appeal from special term. Conrad Stubing sued John Stubing and Annie Stubing, to have a certain deed declared void and canceled of record. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Wyck, J.
The conclusion of law that the deed of premises tras null and void, and should be canceled of record, was fully justified by the findings of iact herein, so the question presented to our consideration is, does the evidence sustain these findings? This was virtually the attitude assumed in the argument of appellant’s counsel. After carefully reading the testimony, our answer must be in the affirmative. The decision righted a most glaring wrong. The testimony convincingly shows that plaintiff, an old man of over 70years, had owned, possessed, and occupied the premises, worth about $2,500, for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Prutsman v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Jackson v. Twenty-Third Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Jackson ex dem. M'Crea v. DunlapNew York Supreme Court · 1799
- Nichols v. McCarthySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1885
- Stilwell v. HubbardNew York Supreme Court · 1838
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.