Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Dorfman v. Standard Surety & Casualty Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 5, 1941No. Civ. 6-467PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
This is an action upon a bond required by 40 U.S.C.A. § 270a(2), namely, a payment bond “for the protection of all persons supplying labor and material in the prosecution of the work * * * ”, namely, that specified in a contract entered into by Reuben Malkin, Inc., with the United States Government, concerning work done at 201 Varick Street (U. S. Appraiser’s Stores) New York City.
It sufficiently appears that there was such a contract and that the contractor did not pay in full for the labor involved, and that some resultant liability attached to the defendant Surety…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- United States ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1907
- First Nat. Bank of Dothan v. American Surety Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
3Cited by6 opinions
- Tri-State Employment Services, Inc. v. The Mountbatten Surety Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- Southern Painting Company Of Tennessee, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Village of Cambridge, Illinois, for the Use and Benefit of R. Clyde Shilling v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
- Southern Painting Co. of Tennessee, Inc. v. United States ex rel. SilverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- State ex rel. Fager & Friesen Insurance Agency v. Storms-Green Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.