Legal Opinion

Gleim v. Rise

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 15, 1837PublishedCited by 15 opinions

ERROR to the common pleas of Lebanon comity. Adam Rise, for the use of his creditors, against Charles Gleim.

1Opinion of the Court

The case and circumstances of it are very fully stated in the opinion of the Court which was delivered by

Huston, J.

This was an action for the use and occupation of a house'in Lebanon during part of the year 1827. The pleas were, that defendant did not assume, and did not assmne within six years. The plaintiff proved by his son, that about two years before the time, (1837,) he was sent by his father to the defendant, to know whether it would be worth while for his father to come to Harrisburg to settle with the defendant — that it was about the rent he was sent to inquire. The defendant said…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tewksbury v. MagraffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Shaffer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  3. Farmers Deposit National Bank v. Western Pennsylvania Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Thurmond v. TrammellTexas Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Gallagher v. Bennett's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API