Legal Opinion
McCain v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
Decided March 22, 2000No. 716-99PublishedCited by 606 opinions
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION ON STATE’S PFTITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Opinion of the Court · KellerKeller, J.
in which McCORMICK, P.J., and MANSFIELD, PRICE, HOLLAND, WOMACK, JOHNSON and KEASLER, J.J., joined.
Our prior opinion is withdrawn.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated robbery. On appeal, he alleged that the evidence was legally and factually insufficient to prove the aggravating element of aggravated robbery — that he used or exhibited a deadly weapon. See Texas Penal Code § 29.03(a)(2). Agreeing with appellant that the evidence was legally insufficient to prove that element, the Court of Appeals reformed the conviction to robbery and…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Patterson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by606 opinions
- Drichas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Johnson, Manley DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
- Sierra, AntonioCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- Adame v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
601 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.