Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Johnson

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 2011No. 1878 WDA 2010PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

Willie D. Johnson, III (“Johnson”) appeals pro se from the judgment of sentence entered following his convictions of possession of a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver (“PWID”), possession of drug paraphernalia, and conspiracy. 1 For the following reasons, we affirm.

On or about November 13, 2007, Detective Donald Dacus of the Erie Police Department met with a confidential informant (“Cl”), who informed Detective Da-cus that three black males were selling crack cocaine out of 457 East 8th Street, Apartment # 1. The Cl stated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrazierSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Commonwealth v. RegaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. HolleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. RushSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. SmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. OrieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. GriffinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Commonwealth v. NeysmithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Com. v. Faison, W.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Hassel, R. v. Franzi, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API