Reese v. Georgia Power Co.

Although I agree with the first two divisions of the majority opinion, I must respectfully dissent as to Division 3 as I find a genuine *134issue of material fact remains as to whether Standley was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of the collision.

“ ‘A presumption arises when an employee is operating his employer’s automobile at the time of a collision, that he was acting within the scope of his employment. Allen Kane’s Major Dodge v. Barnes, 243 Ga. 776 (257 SE2d 186) (1979); Johnstown Fin. Corp. v. Roper, 170 Ga. App. 575 (317 SE2d 634) (1984); Massey v. Henderson, 138 Ga.…