Legal Opinion

People v. Velasquez

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

*907Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of three counts of murder in the second degree. There was a single witness to the killings and the evidence against defendant came principally from her. Her status as an accomplice was submitted to the jury as a question of fact.

We agree with the Appellate Division that the court’s instruction on the subject was error and requires a new trial. The court charged the jury that an "accomplice means a witness in a criminal action who, according to the evidence adduced…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. People v. SpataroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. People v. SuarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API