People v. Velasquez
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
*907Defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of three counts of murder in the second degree. There was a single witness to the killings and the evidence against defendant came principally from her. Her status as an accomplice was submitted to the jury as a question of fact.
We agree with the Appellate Division that the court’s instruction on the subject was error and requires a new trial. The court charged the jury that an "accomplice means a witness in a criminal action who, according to the evidence adduced…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. BergerNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. JamesNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. CareyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. SpataroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. HillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. SuarezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.