Legal Opinion

United Steelworkers of America v. Rohm & Haas Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 28, 2010No. 2:05-mj-00039Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JOYNER, District Judge.

This matter has once again been brought before the Court for disposition of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment on the claims of Plaintiffs Lewis Griffin and George Hemmert. For the reasons outlined in the pages that follow, both of the parties’ motions shall be granted in part and denied in part.

History of the Case

According to the allegations contained in the First Amended Complaint 1 , Defendant Rohm and Haas Company provided various types of disability benefits to its employees pursuant to bargained-for agreements negotiated by the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API