Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brazos River Authority v. City of Graham

Texas Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1961No. A-7912Published

1DissentJustice Smith

I respectfully dissent.

Brazos presents three related points, which, if sustained would settle this lawsuit in favor of Brazos. The substance of these points is that the City of Graham, as a riparian landowner, has no vested right to have the water flow by its land with undiminished speed; that the Brazos River Authority is not liable for consequential damages where such damage was caused solely by using the bed and banks of the Brazos River for the storage and flow of water under the statutory direction of the State; and that the city, as the owner of land bordering a navigable stream holds…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. United States v. DickinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Bauman v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1897

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API