In re Kramer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Per Curiam.
Respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, Second Department, in 1962. In June 1999, this Court suspended him from practice for a period of two years, a suspension which is still in effect (see, Matter of Kramer, 262 AD2d 860, Iv denied 93 NY2d 1038). During the period covered by the instant charges, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law in the Town of Sidney, Delaware County.
We grant petitioner’s motion to confirm a Referee’s report which sustained specifications of misconduct against respondent and we find respondent guilty of the following…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In re KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- In re KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- In re KramerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999