Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 30, 1988No. 2, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McAULIFFE, Judge.

This appeal involves an increased sentence following retrial. Petitioner contends that the increase is in violation of a Maryland statute or, in the alternative, is prohibited by the Due Process Clause of the United States Constitution. Because we agree that there was a lack of compliance with the requirements of the controlling statute, we shall vacate the sentence without reaching the constitutional issue.

I. Facts

Ernest F. Davis was convicted in 1978, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, of first degree rape and of a first degree sexual offense. He was sentenced by Judge…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Kaczorowski v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  4. Wasman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Texas v. McCulloughSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Twigg v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
  3. Cathcart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Eagan v. AydCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  5. Dixon v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API